News & Analysis

Ross & Malone, unlikely to battle for Boyd's slot reps?

By PFF Analysis Team
May 1, 2017
Cincinnati Bengals John Ross Josh Malone

All Featured Tools

PFF Edge

Unlock Player Grades, Fantasy & NFL Draft

Learn More
$39.99 /yr
$9.99 / mo
Sign Up

PFF Elite

Unlock Premium Stats, Greenline Picks & DFS

Learn More

Includes all of PFF Edge

$199.99 /yr
$34.99 / mo
Sign Up
SEATTLE, WA - NOVEMBER 12: Wide receiver John Ross #1 of the Washington Huskies is congratulated by tight end David Ajamu #85 after scoring a touchdown against the USC Trojans on November 12, 2016 at Husky Stadium in Seattle, Washington. The Trojans defeated the Huskies 24-13. (Photo by Otto Greule Jr/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** David Ajamu;John Ross
  • Though John Ross and Josh Malone were efficient in their limited slot usage last year, with a respective 5.28 YPPR (yards per route run, 211 yards on 40 routes) and 4.80 YPRR (197 on 41 snaps), their college usage profiles them as potential upgrades for Brandon LaFell at the ‘Z’ position.
  • Ross ran only 6.4 percent of his routes from the slot in 2016 (40 of 623), while 81 percent of his yardage came from outside the slot (929 of 1140 yards).
  • Malone ran only 5.2 percent of his routes from the slot in 2016 (41 of 786), while 80 percent of his yardage came from outside the slot (775 of 972 yards).
  • Tyler Boyd, Cincinnati’s 2nd round pick from 2016, ran 45.4 percent of his routes from the slot in 2015 (157 of 346) at Pittsburgh and his 2.48 YPRR from the slot ranked sixth overall for qualifying wide receivers from the 2016 draft class.
  • The Bengals already have a volume slot receiver in Boyd, so Ross and Malone are more likely to replace Brandon LaFell and serve as insurance in the event that A.J. Green struggle with injury again in 2017.

 

Cincinnati Bengals Slot WRs

PFF Edge

PFF Elite