In this series of articles, I’m looking at the breakout potential for running backs available in the middle rounds of fantasy drafts. This builds on my recent breakout receiver articles that profiled each of the second-year wide receivers. My research on 10 years of historical data points to second- and third-year backs as the most likely to break out from middling draft positions and also the most likely to generate the most excess value. You can find the rest of the articles on breakout running backs here.
[Editor’s note: Subscribe to PFF ELITE today to gain access to PFF’s Premium Stats and new Player Grades experience in addition to the 2020 NFL Draft Guide, 2020 Fantasy Rookie Scouting Report, PFF Greenline, all of PFF’s premium article content and more.]
This article will focus on rookie disappointment Darrell Henderson, currently the RB46 in best-ball drafts. Hope was high for Henderson going into 2019 with Todd Gurley II hampered and the Los Angeles Rams trading up to select him in the third round. Unfortunately, Henderson didn’t see the field much as a rookie, and his breakout hopes for 2020 took a serious hit after the Rams grabbed Cam Akers in the second round of this year's draft.
One of the best ways to determine the range of outcomes and the probability of success for fantasy players is comparing them to similar historical players. In this analysis, I’ll compare Henderson to hundreds of running backs drafted since 2006 and project the likelihood of his breakout based on those who had the most similar size, draft position and rookie metrics.
I’ll be especially focused on the receiving potential for these backs, as the outperformance in receiving volume and efficiency has been the most common trait for breakout running backs in the past.
The matching methodology for this set of articles is similar to that for the 2020 wide receiver and running back prospects, where I found the closest statistically comparable players using principal component analysis (PCA) and the euclidean distance between the players' components. Then, I gave each a “similarity” score based on percentile of distance.
The metrics for PCA are draft position and rookie numbers for rush attempts per game, targets per game and PPR fantasy points per game. I also use weight and 40-yard dash times as filters, only including historical players within +/- 15 pounds and +/- 0.15 seconds in the matching process.
DARRELL HENDERSON COMPS