Fantasy News & Analysis

Premium Content Sign Up

Week 3 DraftKings Monday Night Football Showdown: New York Giants vs. Dallas Cowboys

Arlington, Texas, USA;Dallas Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott (21) reacts after an interception against the Seattle Seahawks in the fourth quarter at AT&T Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Tim Heitman-USA TODAY Sports

• Consider injuries: The projections assume Kadarius Toney (doubtful) and Dalton Schultz (questionable) are not going to play.

• Best CPT value: Richie James Jr. has the most positive leverage for the CPT spot.

• Best FLEX values: Ezekiel Elliott and Michael Gallup showing value in FLEX positions.

Click here to become an expert on the Showdown format and winning strategies.

Estimated Reading Time: 6 mins

Click here to sign up and try PFF+ for free!

We'll analyze all of the NFL’s “island” games (TNF, SNF and MNF) and playoff matchups this season for DFS purposes, utilizing PFF’s weekly projections, current betting lines and millions of simulated historical combinations to identify the best and worst values for an upcoming matchup.

There are five main components to this Showdown slate analysis that you’ll find below:

  • A breakdown of methodology and the most similar historical matchup to this game: 2017 Week 17: Indianapolis ColtsHouston Texans, with Jacoby Brissett as Daniel Jones and T.J. Yates playing the role of Cooper Rush.
  • Optimal lineup allocations (CPT and total roster) for both teams based on the results of similar historical matchups.
  • Comparison of player ownership projections for FLEX and CPT produced by a model trained on 2018-2022 Showdown contest results to optimal allocations.
  • Recent CPT ownership trends illustrated for both starting lineups.
  • A table showing the most common players on optimal lineups for each player. This allows you to see which other players are commonly found on the same optimal lineups as a player you’re interested in rostering.


To analyze this specific Showdown slate, I looked through thousands of NFL matchups from 2014 to 2022 and found the closest analogies to this contest according to the following parameters: Betting spread, over/under and average fantasy points scoring for the top-ranked positional players of both rosters (QB1, RB1, WR1, TE1).

I won’t detail every matchup that falls into the top 100 for this game, but for illustration purposes, let’s look at the most similar matchup:

Historical Current
Player Pos Team Player Pos Team
Jacoby Brissett QB IND Daniel Jones QB NYG
Frank Gore RB IND Saquon Barkley RB NYG
T.Y. Hilton WR IND Sterling Shepard WR NYG
Jack Doyle TE IND Daniel Bellinger TE NYG
T.J. Yates QB HST Cooper Rush QB DAL
Lamar Miller RB HST Ezekiel Elliott RB DAL
Will Fuller WR HST CeeDee Lamb WR DAL
Stephen Anderson TE HST Jake Ferguson TE DAL

The spread and over/under are similar in these matchups (Colts -5.5, 42 O/U versus this matchup at Giants -1, 39.5 O/U). All the players aren’t perfect matches, but that’s why we use 100 similar matchups and not just the single most similar.

The optimal roster for that historical matchup, assuming positional salaries equaled what they are for this showdown slate, would have been:

Player Team Position Roster Position Fantasy Pts
Frank Gore IND RB CPT 17.1
Alfred Blue HST RB FLEX 17.5
Jack Doyle IND TE FLEX 13.8
Colts IND DST FLEX 12.0
Marlon Mack IND RB FLEX 11.8
Jacoby Brissett IND QB FLEX 10.4

For this game and 99 other similar matchups, I calculated every possible combination that fits with Showdown rules (one CPT, at least one offensive player from each team) and would fall under the $50K salary threshold, assuming the salaries for the historical similar matchups are the same as those for this contest.


The most unique part of the format, and therefore the biggest opportunity for a competitive advantage, is choosing your CPT. Should you always choose a QB who typically has the highest absolute fantasy scoring? Are defenses and kickers viable options? RB versus WR?

I went through the millions of possible lineup combinations for the 100 most similar matchups and found who the CPT selections were on the top-five scoring lineups for each matchup. Here are the 500 CPT choices from those matchups by position rank according to salary.


This graph illustrates the full range of allocations for the different positions to measure how many of the 500 optimal rosters had exactly zero, one or two of the given positions.


The boxplot above shows the ranges for CPT ownership for each starting player in contests since 2019.

Projected ownership versus optimal

This is where the analysis comes together and becomes actionable. What’s most important when viewing these numbers is to contrast them to the optimal numbers taken from the analysis above for different positions. Then, we see where the leverage may exist.

The two tables below compare the optimal allocations above, with adjustments for the personnel of this particular matchup, to our ownership projections for CPT and FLEX.



Unlimited Fantasy League Sync
Fantasy Start/Sit Line-Up Optimizer & Waiver Wire
WR-CB & OL-DL Matchups, PFF Player Grades, & Premium Stats 2.0 Tools
Nathan Jahnkes Rankings - #1 Most Accurate Last 70 Weeks
PFF Best Bets, Player Props, & Power Ranking Tools
NFL Mock Draft Sim with Trades & Draft Grades

Already have a subscription? Log In


Unlock the 2023 Fantasy Draft Kit, with League Sync, Live Draft Assistant, PFF Grades & Data Platform that powers all 32 Pro Teams

$31 Draft Kit Fee + $8.99/mo
$89.88/yr + FREE Draft Kit