In the past couple weeks, we walked through the historical results and methodology for our wide receiver prospect model, and then applied it to the 2016 class. Now that we've built the equivalent for running backs entering the NFL, let's take a look at the 2016 running back prospects under the microscope.
First, we need to revisit the methodology briefly to make sure we understand what's driving the model. We trained and tested the model to find the most predictive variables for early NFL success, which I've defined as at least one top-12 (PPR scoring), or RB1 season in the first three years of a running back's career. Simplicity is always a priority when developing a model, and our running back success model provides strong accuracy with only three independent variables:
1. Draft age
2. Final season rushing touchdowns
3. Final season receiving yards
Age was also shown to have significance for wide receivers, with younger prospects preferred. It seems a bit strange to not have rushing yards in the formula, but touchdowns have more predictive power. Perhaps this is due to the fact that touchdowns are more correlated with weight, which I plan to add to the model after the NFL combine. The value of receiving yards is certainly buoyed by our choice to uses PPR scoring for our measurement of success.
Here are the results for the 2016 class.
Name | College | Year | Age | Rush TDs | Rec Yds | Predict |
Ezekiel Elliott | Ohio State | 2016 | 20.9 | 23 | 206 | 0.70 |
Derrick Henry | Alabama | 2016 | 22.0 | 28 | 91 | 0.54 |
Kenneth Dixon | Louisiana Tech | 2016 | 22.4 | 19 | 464 | 0.53 |
Alex Collins | Arkansas | 2016 | 21.8 | 20 | 95 | 0.31 |
Paul Perkins | UCLA | 2016 | 21.6 | 14 | 242 | 0.30 |
CJ Prosise | Notre Dame | 2016 | 22.1 | 11 | 308 | 0.19 |
Tyler Ervin | San Jose State | 2016 | 22.7 | 13 | 334 | 0.18 |
Deandre Washington | Texas Tech | 2016 | 23.4 | 14 | 385 | 0.15 |
Darius Jackson | Eastern Michigan | 2016 | 22.6 | 14 | 201 | 0.13 |
Peyton Barber | Auburn | 2016 | 22.0 | 13 | 112 | 0.13 |
Hat tip to Jon Moore for collecting the draft ages for the 2016 prospects. Prospect age is calculated as of mid-year 2016. The “Predict” column gives the model score (between 1 and 0) for each prospect indicating the likelihood of a top-12 PPR season in a prospect's first three years.
The top of the board should lay to rest any concerns about the model's simplicity: four of the top five prospects match between our model and NFL Draft Scout's rankings.
Ezekiel Elliott looks just as dominating in the model as he does on the field. Elliott provides the perfect storm for running back success: young, lots of touchdowns, and proficiency in the passing game. Elliott's 0.70 success score would have him tied for seventh place against the entire 2000-2013 database.
Derrick Henry is the 2016 leader in rushing touchdowns, but is a clear notch down from Elliott due to his older age, and more importantly the lack of passing game production. The fact that hefty Henry wasn’t heavily involved in the passing game in college doesn’t mean he won’t be in the pros, but it leaves that question uncertain at best.
Kenneth Dixon is the flip side of Henry: fewer rushing touchdowns but strong passing game chops. Dixon is currently seen as a second or third round pick, but his 0.53 nearly matches that of the much more highly rated Henry. Dixon is much smaller than many of the top prospects, so I doubt that even a strong combine will propel him into the first round of the NFL draft.
Alex Collins, like Henry, didn’t top 100 passing yards in his final season. But unlike Henry, Collins’ smaller build profiles more like that of a pass-catcher. Collins could end a value in dynasty rookie drafts if he shows pass-catching ability during combine drills.
Paul Perkins is a surprise top 5 success score. Perkins is seen as a third or fourth round pick by analysts, but our model is fond of his younger age and good receiving numbers. It will be interesting to see if the model and prospect experts’ opinions of Perkins converge as get closer to the draft.
Name | College | Year | Age | Rush TDs | Rec Yds | Predict |
Devontae Booker | Utah | 2016 | 24.1 | 11 | 316 | 0.04 |
A name conspicuously absent from the model’s top 10 is Devontae Booker, who is currently viewed as a top 5 prospect. Booker has good receiving yards, but the model doesn’t look kindly on his older age and lack of rushing touchdowns. Utah’s 6-7, 233-pound quarterback Travis Wilson scored seven touchdown last year, holding down Booker’s total. Booker could certainly blow up the combine and look much better in the updated model, but I doubt his model projection will ever match his draft position.
Below is a sortable table of the 2016 running back class with the relevant variables and prediction scores.
Kevin Cole is a Lead Writer for PFF Fantasy. You can follow him on Twitter at @Cole_Kev
[table id=1170 /]